NEW YORK — The Met Gala unveiled Amazon as its newest sponsor this year, prompting immediate frustration as attendees discovered that every couture look on the red carpet immediately had a cheaper, worse version available on the company’s website.
The $10 million sponsorship, personally approved by Jeff Bezos, was intended to “democratize high fashion” and “streamline the gala experience,” according to Amazon representatives. Guests, however, reported that the only thing streamlined was the dignity of the event.
“I spent six months working with Anna Wintour on this look,” said one celebrity, gesturing to a sculptural gown made of reclaimed Venetian glass. “Then a notification popped up suggesting I try a polyester version with ‘minor aesthetic fixes’ for $39.99. It said it could arrive before dessert.”
Observers noted that as celebrities ascended the iconic steps, discreet Alexa-enabled kiosks softly whispered alternatives such as “Customers also viewed: slightly less ambitious cape” and “Frequently returned: emotional vulnerability.”
Backlash to Bezos’ sponsorship was swift. Beyond his political beliefs, critics argued that injecting $10 million into one of fashion’s most elite events while simultaneously encouraging bargain-bin substitutions felt “on brand in the worst possible way.” Protesters gathered outside chanting, “Two-day shipping, not two-tier culture,” while others held signs reading “Prime Wardrobe, Prime Inequality.”
Fashion insiders were equally unimpressed. “The Met Gala is about fantasy,” one designer said. “Not a side-by-side comparison with something that arrives vacuum-sealed.”
In response, Amazon defended the initiative, noting that all suggested alternatives were “algorithmically optimized for mediocrity” and came with free returns.
Please share our content below…
